Sue Rodriguez changed how we think On Monday, it will be 20 years since the Supreme Court of Canada told Sue Rodriguez she had no legal right to take her own life.
Any form of life that resides higher than Porifera on the food chain — Sponges is intrinsically instilled with a will for survival. We Humans, have debated as to whether we have the right to end that survival voluntarily, whether or not that debate is logically sound, or filled with non sequitur arguments.
This debate is about death. Death is not pretty. Death does not hold that dignified Shakespearean glory that vacillates between tragedy and triumph. When we die, we all lose control of our bodily functions; the last strained groan for breath falls short, and it is in that moment that we will all realize that Death is the teasingly loneliest act in our regrettably short plays.
Whether Euthanasia is done through voluntary or involuntary assertion, we deserve the option of not dying this ugly, and this lonely. I argue that we all have the right to die with dignity, even though there is no "Dignity"; there is nothing to be proud about I will give you the answers to questions regarding the practice of Euthanasia, and, if decriminalization, or the legalization of this option can be provided with guarantees of it not becoming an abused privilege if we take our lessons who know what they are talking about.
I know this is true through drawing on personal past experiences. It becomes a cat-and-mouse game with a turmoil experienced by virtually every youth in their adolescence. Doctors are trained to care; they are sworn to care — Hippocrates assured us of this promise.
There are Doctors for the depressed; high school years will pass; people become accepting of one another as they grow older, and attitudes, and beliefs adapt and evolve to the expectations of societal morals and standards. Nevertheless, there are people in our society who want to die, regardless of what society can do for them — existence for these people is just too painful, and unbearable.
I put to you then that it is our duty and moral obligation to assist these people as much as we can.
Many, many people are very repulsed by this idea, and there are many people who completely agree with the concept of euthanasia. Many religious people object to euthanasia. Destroying a human life would be an insult to divinity.
Furthermore, most civilized Western nations uphold the prohibition on killing because the taking of another human life is considered an ethical guideline that cannot be crossed, or controlled and conditioned through ethical concerns and argumentation, although this is clearly an ethical debate.
Further proclivity against euthanasia is it is not prudent to advocate the practice of euthanasia. That is to say, eventually, in all our lives, we may suffer some form of pain or discomfit, and if we think far enough ahead, we might think that it is better if the doctors that we depend on are not tempted to practice euthanasia on anybody, particularly ourselves.
Like all medical procedures, euthanasia can fail, or bring additional suffering. Some people will claim, and some people have claimed, that if euthanasia is legalized, doctors will begin to provide peer-pressure that will force people into euthanistic scenarios for any number of reasons some being to reduce medical costs, or because their family wants them to die.
Many people will be influenced that they will be saving their family the exorbitant medical costs — none of these are coercive arguments, and they should not disqualify any individual from providing their consent.
If a doctor is trained to both cure, and kill, then a doctor will be placed in a position where they would, or could, be continuously asked to provide their judgment as to when euthanasia is necessary. In addition, any best effort a physician might be able to provide in saving a Human life might not be exploited.
The death penalty has been practiced for all of recorded history Humans have no problem justifying murder through acts of war — just or otherwise; as an act self-defense, or as a genuine religious practice.
Muslims have continued the practice of stoning a person to death until as recently as seven months ago. In medieval Europe, methods of execution would depend on the social class of the condemned.
The nobility would usually be executed in as painless and honourable a method as possible, generally with an axe which occasionally, gruesomely failed. Those in the working class, serfs, peasants, and possibly the bourgeoisie would usually be executed publicly, in a more gruesome and painful method of execution, typically by hanging or by the wheel.
Specific crimes would sometimes warrant specific methods of execution: Unsuccessful assassinations of royalty warranted a horrible, and prolonged death. After reflecting on that paper, and doing a more thorough research on the topic, a glaring fact remained; the removal of capital punishment from the Canadian Criminal Code in has not led to an increase in the murder rate in this country Canada.
Statistics Canada has reported that the murder rate for was the lowest it has been since 1. This brings me to my first issue — that of responding to the false assumptions that the legalization of Euthanasia will provide a starting point for unmerited, wanton, and uncontrolled acts of sanctioned murder of all walks of the human race — from the depressed to the terminally ill.
People would be forced into positions where decisions that warranted deaths of any individual would be based on virtually interminable arguments of legal costs, or the burdens that the sick, or perhaps our own health, places on us individually, or on our loved ones.SUE RODRIGUEZ.
Appellant. AND: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA and. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA. Respondents. FACTUM OF THE INTERVENOR, COPOH PART 1 - STATEMENT OF FACTS A.
INTRODUCTION. 1. The Coalition of Provincial Organizations of the Handicapped ("COPOH") intervenes in this appeal pursuant to an Order made by Mr. Justice Major on . Jun 28, · Euthanasia is a physician or others ‘killing’ of a suffering patient in attempt to hasten death and alleviate pain.
In the game of life and death: life is the most obvious answer one would think. This is not always the case, so euthanasia or assisted suicide is an extremely controversial topic of today.
Euthanasia is currently legal in the states of Washington DC, California, Colorado, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington. Around the world, there are different organizations that campaign to change legislation about the issue of physician-assisted death, or PAD. Sue Rodriguez is, and will remain, mentally competent. She has testified at trial to the fact that she alone, in consultation with her physician, wishes to control the decision-making regarding the timing and circumstances of her death. Jun 28, · Euthanasia is a physician or others ‘killing’ of a suffering patient in attempt to hasten death and alleviate pain. In the game of life and death: life is the most obvious answer one would think. This is not always the case, so euthanasia or assisted suicide is an extremely controversial topic of today.
Sue Rodriguez Essay Examples. 9 total results. An Argument in Favor of Euthanasia Because It Is Everyone's Choice. 1, words. 2 pages. Sue Rodriguez and Her Influence in Application of Euthanasia. 1, words. An Analysis of the Euthanasia in the . COPOH has no special knowledge about Sue Rodriguez's life beyond that which appears in the decisions of the courts below, in her factum, and n various media reports.
Based on this information, it would appear Ms. Rodriguez is blessed with a loving and supportive family, the personal resources to meet her basic needs and unrestricted access to. On February 12, , with the assistance of an anonymous doctor, Sue Rodriguez took her own life by ingesting a liquid mixture of morphine and secobarbital The doctor's intervention was arranged by MP Svend Robinson, who was regarded as one of Rodriguez's most prominent supporters.
Robinson was present at her death. Media focus on individual cases: People, such as Sue Rodriguez – an ALS sufferer who took her fight to die to the Supreme Court of Canada – pleading for euthanasia, make dramatic, personally and emotionally gripping television.